Licensing In NSW Will Be Catastrophic For The Health, Safety and Rights Of Sex Workers. | | Print | |
Written by Sex Party NSW | |||||
Thursday, 30 August 2012 15:30 | |||||
Australian Sex Party Lord Mayor candidate for the City of Sydney, Zahra Stardust, has claimed that the Liberal Government’s plans to introduce a licensing system to regulate sex work in NSW would be ‘catastrophic for the health, safety and human rights of sex workers’. She states that ‘Evidence from Queensland and Victoria shows that licensing has proven to be an expensive, ineffective and unworkable model to regulate the sex industry.’ In comparison, she says: ‘The UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon supports decriminalisation as a human rights approach to ending discrimination against sex workers. UNAIDS supports decriminalisation as part of a best practice approach to HIV Prevention. The UN Population Fund insists upon universal rights for sex workers. Current epidemiology shows that decriminalisation provides sex workers with better access to OHS, industrial rights and peer education.’ Stardust notes that while licensing is sometimes misleadingly referred to as ‘legalisation’, it is more accurately described as ‘over-regulation’: ‘The excessive legislative requirements involved in licensing mean that large segments of the industry are often forced underground, presenting obstacles to sex worker access to health, safety, outreach, peer education and justice.’ Ms Stardust explains:
In comparison, Stardust says that ‘NSW has enjoyed nearly 17 years of decriminalisation and is held up as a role model around the world in terms of best-practice sex industry regulation.’ Stardust says that decriminalisation does not mean no regulation: ‘Decriminalisation means whole-of-government regulation.’ Under a decriminalised model, sex industry businesses are treated like any other business. They are subject to existing regulatory mechanisms, such as: local council planning; zoning and location controls; workers compensation requirements; occupational health and safety standards; and industrial rights obligations. Police are not involved as regulators at any level unless there is a breach of law. The LASH (Law and Sexual Health) project recommends that the licensing of sex work should not be regarded as a viable legislative response. In their comparative study of 3 different regulatory models in Australia (criminalisation in Perth, licensing in Victoria and decriminalisation in Sydney), researchers found that under a decriminalised model, sex workers have better access to occupational health and safety and outreach services. ‘The New South Wales and New Zealand experiences show that decriminalisation does not increase the size of the sex industry. Instead, it brings better access to justice, health and safety for sex workers,’ says Ms Stardust. http://www.sexparty.org.au/Sydney-Candidate-Info/meet-our-city-of-sydney-candidates.html
Only registered users can write comments!
!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved." |
|||||
Last Updated on Thursday, 30 August 2012 16:21 |