Theresa May has mastered a strategy people are calling geile weiber between a Norway-style compromise agreement with the Labour party so as to produce a parliamentary consensus on Brexit, stating the opposition party’s refusal to take the backstop arrangement set the UK on a path for no offer.
Some cabinet ministers are known to be drawn to the programs instead if May’s negotiated bargain fails to pass the House of Commons.
But on Thursday May repeated her rejection from this”Norway and” version and indicated that she wouldn’t be ready to provide it as a compromise agreement since it would indicate the continuation of liberty of motion. That’s considered in Downing Street since the toughest of the prime minister’s red lines.
Over 90 Conservatives along with the overwhelming bulk of those Labour MPs have openly confirmed they won’t back it.
“I have been really clear about my situation, we will not be in the customs union,” she stated, onboard her RAF Voyager airplane into the two-day summit in Buenos Aires.
“Everything you see from the governmental statement is that which could be a bargain for the United Kingdom which isn’t Norway, it’s not Canada, it’s a tougher free trade arrangement than Canada, and it finishes completely free motion — that Norway does not do.”
Asked whether the version are the only method to acquire Labour votes, then the prime minister indicated that the final effect of the plan put forward by darkness Brexit secretary Keir Starmer are the UK leaving without a offer.
“You speak about whether a Norway-style plan would bring Labour with it if you have a look at the Labour party change they’ve put to the movement about the 11th of December, really what they’re doing is advocating rejecting the bargain we have negotiated with the European Union with no appropriate alternative for this,” she explained.
“They say that they do not need no price, but by looking to deny a temporary backstopthey are effectively advocating no offer. With no backstop, there’s not any offer.”
May suggested she thought there wasn’t any compromise that could entail Labour. “What they really need to see is just another general election,” she explained. “And so they aren’t acting I the federal attention, they’re placing their narrow celebration interest ”
The prime minister insisted that the consequence of a vote wasn’t a foregone conclusion despite her mutinous backbenchers’ stated goals. “Everybody said we wouldn’t find a bargain, and we’re in the position of owning a bargain, all you appear to need to be inquiring about is another point,” she told reporters. “We have not had the vote nonetheless. Let us focus.