Sex Party responds to Rundle: is the sex industry getting bang for its buck? |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
Written by ASP | Rob Ruminski
|
Friday, 27 July 2012 17:11 |
Rob Ruminski, Australian Sex Party volunteer, on behalf of Fiona Patten, Robbie Swan, Christian Vega and The Australian Sex Party, writes: Re. “Rundle: is the sex industry getting bang for its buck?” (Monday, item 11). The following is a refutation of claims and representations made in Guy Rundle’s article.
Rundle wrote:
“[The Sex Party is] an outgrowth of the Eros Foundation, the sex industry lobby group, and it is less keen on the pure expression of human freedom than it is in pushing for a particular regulatory regime that benefits the legal sex industry. It has a bunch of policies about drug decriminalisation, internet non-censorship, etc, but its main game is to enforce a strict line between the legal and non-legal sex trade, to the benefit of the former.”
The Victorian branch of the Australian Sex Party’s policy on sex work is very clear. The ASP advocates for decriminalisation of sex work, and does not support the current legal/regulatory regime. The policy can be found here.
While the Victorian Party’s policy has not yet been ratified federally (an administrative oversight), it has been ratified in NSW as well. This is the approach that has been advocated at every level of the party in every instance. This is also the only policy on sex work that exists at any level of the party. We would challenge Rundle to produce evidence to the contrary.
As to the claims regarding associations between Eros and the brothel industry, this is patently untrue. According to Robbie Swan:
“The Eros Association stopped taking brothel owners as members over a decade ago when it became the adult ‘retail’ association. As a result we now only have one brothel in Victoria as an associate member on a fee of $590 per year. The only other brothel to have supported the Sex Party with a donation of $500 was The Boardroom of Melbourne, a couple of years ago. Mr. Rundle’s suggestion that the Victorian brothel owners are big supporters of the Eros Association is demonstrably untrue. Rundle appears ignorant of the fact that the legal Victorian brothels have their own industry association anyway. The annual returns of both the Eros Association (an incorporated not for profit adult industry association) and The S-x Party (a registered political party) are on the public record.”
|
Read more... [Sex Party responds to Rundle: is the sex industry getting bang for its buck?]
|
|
Sex Party threatens Google after ad spat |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
Written by Sydney Morning Herald | Asher Moses
|
Friday, 20 July 2012 11:29 |
The Australian Sex Party has threatened Google with legal action after the search engine refused to run its ads on the eve of tomorrow's Melbourne by-election.
It comes after Sex Party ads were blocked by Google at the last federal election because the company - which is typically opposed to censorship - perceived the text as too racy (the ads were reinstated by Google the day before the election).
"We need to take this further. They are blatantly treating us differently to the Greens."
Sex Party candidate Fiona Patten said this time the search giant said it would not approve her ads "because we have a donate button on our page and we're not a charity".
"It's giving me the shits that in two elections we've not been able to run ads with Google when all of the other political parties have had no problem," she said.
Patten has accused Google of inconsistently applying its rules, as the Greens candidate in the state by-election, Cathy Oke, has ads running on Google despite having multiple donate buttons on her web page.
"We've sent them screenshots of the donate buttons on the ALP and the Greens sites and they've allowed all of those ads to run," she said.
|
Read more... [Sex Party threatens Google after ad spat]
|
Greens snub could cost preferences in Melbourne by-election |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
Written by Herald Sun | Ashley Gardiner
|
Friday, 20 July 2012 09:21 |
The Greens could lose their bid for the seat of Melbourne because of a history of snubbing the Sex Party.
Preferences will be crucial in determining Saturday's by-election result, and the Sex Party will direct its preferences to Labor.
Sex Party candidate Fiona Patten said she was concerned by the "anti-sex feminist" element in the Greens.
A poll conducted this week by ReachTEL found that Ms Patten was attracting 6.1 per cent support, putting her in third place.
Greens candidate Cathy Oke was leading on 38.1 per cent, marginally ahead of Labor's Jennifer Kanis on 36.5 per cent.
This would mean the outcome would be decided by the preferences of those who vote for Ms Patten and other minor candidates.
This week's poll found that one in four voters would support a candidate other than Dr Oke or Ms Kanis.
More than 10,000 votes that went to the Liberals in Melbourne at the 2010 election are up for grabs after the party's decision not to stand.
Ms Patten said the stand-offish attitude from the Greens dates back to the 2010 election, and the influence of a moralist element in the party.
"We have been concerned about this Left-wing anti-sex feminist position," Ms Patten said.
|
Read more... [Greens snub could cost preferences in Melbourne by-election]
|
NSW Members Meeting 01/08/2012 |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
Written by ASP
|
Wednesday, 18 July 2012 13:33 |
For the information of Australian Sex Party Members
Please join us for a NSW Sex Party members meeting on:
Wednesday 1st August 2012 @ The Local Taphouse Level 1, 122 Flinders St Darlinghurst (5 mins walk from Taylor Sq) From 6:45pm.
This is a members only meeting. Please
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
if you are able to join us.
We hope to see you there.
|
By-election not the shoo-in minor party has predicted |
PDF |
| Print | |
E-mail |
Written by The Australian | John Ferguson
|
Wednesday, 18 July 2012 11:49 |
Voters in the Melbourne by-election have been found to be deeply divided about the Gillard government's performance and the Greens face a much tougher battle to secure the seat than the minor party has claimed.
Pollster ReachTEL has unearthed deep dissatisfaction with the Gillard government among many voters in the inner-city state seat, with more than a third of those surveyed revealing they were less likely to vote Labor at Saturday's by-election based on federal factors.
But the same number of voters declared they were more likely to stick with Labor on the back of Canberra's efforts, suggesting the rusted-on ALP vote may be holding up in the electorate.
The Brisbane-based pollster found that 70 per cent of voters would be influenced, negatively or positively, by the Gillard government's performance, despite the fact it is a state by-election.
This means that, regardless of the result, the fallout from the by-election will be felt nationally as well as in Victoria.
The ReachTEL findings come after The Australian revealed last week that internal Victorian Labor polling suggested three times as many people cited the performance of the federal government, rather than that of the state government, as the reason they would not vote for Labor.
The survey of more than 400 voters on Monday night reported the Greens candidate Cathy Oke securing 38.1 per cent of the first preference vote with Labor's Jennifer Kanis on 36.5 per cent, pointing to a knife-edge result that will be decided by preferences from the other 14 candidates.
Independents and other candidates do not appear to be polling strongly, with the Australian Sex Party's Fiona Patten the third-most popular candidate, securing just 6.1 per cent of the vote, followed by suburban councillor Stephen Mayne on 4.3 per cent. Family First's Ashley Fenn was lagging on 3.8 per cent. The Liberal Party is not running a candidate.
|
Read more... [By-election not the shoo-in minor party has predicted]
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
|
Page 3 of 42 |